Returning to work for that late Summer productivity push with stretch goals at the forefront of their minds, leaders can’t fail to be aware of the pervasive backdrop of identity debates that rage around gender; class; identity; culture and race.

These are unprecedented times. But you would be forgiven for thinking:

“What? Another global crisis  that’s popped up to distract and deflect my teams?”

It’s clear to the enlightened that, far from being a storm to weather, change and change management itself is going to be a lifelong process of continuous development for leaders, especially the people aspects. So time to start dancing in the rain.

 

If your title  on the org chart is leader and yet you’re there on technical merit alone,  you have to be aware that it is going to become increasingly more difficult to justify your status.

 

Critics on one side have suggested that this current emphasis on difference or what sets us apart rather than what we have in common, is a cynical form of populist socio-political engineering aimed at creating loyal tribes. They argue that it has coincided with the coming of age of digital natives and the rising power of digital media. They also claim, that it’s deliberately contrived to divide and thereby enable easier control of the masses, as global agendas overtake national priorities and tempers fray.

 

The other set of critics, on the other hand, suggest that the current discord is a bi-product of the growth of handheld media liberating and giving voice to the previously unheard, the disaffected, the downtrodden and the victimised. They point to the growth in higher education attendance and suggest that this is now manifesting as enlightened thinking.

 

These are just two, domineering but very different readings of the same situation.

 

Can both be right?

Does it matter to you in your role?

 

Whether you favour the money and the power lines; take the supposedly ethical high ground or just keep your eyes focused on more pragmatic horizons, refusing to be drawn, the prevailing truth, as ever, probably lies somewhere in-between the self-interested extremes.

 

Whatever your personal take on the root cause of the culture debate, one of the effects on organisations of these geo-political pressures and discussions, is that the talent management and employment landscape is undoubtedly becoming increasingly complex. This, in turn, demands deeper consideration and sensitivity and certainly more sophisticated and malleable leadership strategies as senior colleagues try to control their controllables, as they are trained to do. Invariably, they will look to influence the aspects of employer or employment brand that they believe they can shape directly.

 

As coaches with several decades of leadership experience at the sharp end, this increasing complexity certainly brings challenges. But, as ever, the fault lines of change also herald greater opportunity for those with the potential to thrive through complexity.

 

The emotionally and intellectually agile leader capable of inhabiting the sense-making role, who has a vision for how the people disciplines influence business outputs and who is dedicated to liberating that latent potential within their teams while remaining focused on their core goals, will become increasingly valuable. There’s little doubting that, now.

 

Typically, in times of change, newness, alternate perspectives and difference is often interpreted or positioned as a threat by those who are insecure about the unknown. And, let’s be honest, most of us welcome the comfort of the familiar over constant uncertainty and every one of us avoids uncomfortable truths, from time to time. Sometimes, insecurity and discomfort is justified when the demands of the changing world seems beyond the realms of our current capability, or threatens to de-stabilise our standing in a competitive world.

 

There is also a natural paranoia about the less scrupulous who look to exploit division in order to manufacture advantages for themselves. These types now seem to get a deal more airtime than they used to, because hysteria and drama and buzz sells. But retreating into extreme conservatism in response can’t be effective for long.

 

Sure, the philosophies of diversity management and multi-culturalism have their logical critics. There are plenty of self-interested charlatans about (that’s human nature) waving flags of popular convenience, after all.  But inclusion and culture change are both concepts bridging anthropology, sociology and the organisation development world, that, within the corporate sphere, started as idealised enlightened thinking, but now have a firm business case, proven in practice and theory. Given the direction of travel of society in general, these concepts simply can’t be ignored. There’s a clear imperative for both diversity and inclusion and culture development linked to sustainable leadership practice, certainly when organisations are properly managed and led.

 

Culture, in organisation terms, refers to norms and ways of working. These can and are clearly informed by nationality and background. But organisational norms are primarily focused on practices that deliver the corporate goals and which can be readily scaled and replicated. They are more deliberately contrived and, even when they have significant legacy roots, serve a pragmatic purpose, first and foremost. They require a high degree of clarity and consistency of application. But even in global corporations it is perfectly possible for leaders and teams to riff around a “set” list that comes from a single playbook, but adapt and interpret it to suit local tastes. In fact, that adaptability is a core part of the role of regional leaders. But it takes skill and guile and nuance and responsiveness as well as governance and focus. Even then, with the best will in the world,  culture change initiatives can be undermined by identity politics and insecurity, if wielded as weapons for political point scoring, as they too often are.

 

Regardless of your starting point, it’s natural and healthy to remain skeptical about the way ED&I is positioned and managed and, indeed,  how far any leader can promote multi-culturalism in its absolute form, within organisation structures that require clear differentiation, controls, compliance,  rules, regulations and consistency. Sadly not every version of being yourself at work will be appropriate for every brand and sometimes values clash or are at odds that just can’t be reconciled. But if individuals and organisations are explicit about their purpose and values before entering into a business relationship, like joining as an employee or purchasing as a customer, that should be less of an issue. Yet, again, that takes systems thinking, strategies and work.

 

For decades now, we have been advocating for leaders to proactively manage their ways of working and corporate culture and, in turn, employment brand. In fact, as showcased in Brand Engagement, Ian was collaborating with the European Institute for Diversity Management back in the 90s, before the term was even widely used and certainly before it was accepted as a business principle and was designing consultancy teams with these principles very much in mind.

 

A core argument for taking a proactive, focused and systems approach to culture management is that, if you don’t, someone else will do it for you and will shape it to their own ends:

 

  1. – checked your Glassdoor reviews lately?
  2. – how’s the recruitment going and what are your suppliers saying about you?
  3. – are your engagement surveys explaining the current talent churn?

 

See how the soft stuff really impacts the hard bottom line?

 

OD isn’t about hearts and flowers. It is actually a form of hard-nosed systems thinking. When it’s approached properly, it will be taken at least as seriously as your strategy for marketing and sales. At least. Why? Because it is the key enabler that drives the hard business outcomes like customer attraction, satisfaction, market share and profitability. Are you regularly reviewing your OD strategy at Board?

Bet you talk about your Marketing plans. So why would you spend £millions to attract customers with lofty promises about the brand, only to disappoint them when they interact with your people and products online or face-to-face? This neglectful practice actually speeds up brand decline…

 

Most OD problems arise, when well-meaning (or in rarer cases malign leaders) equate enabling activity to outcomes or lead only with the ethical imperative. This is made worse when they’re hypocrites,  clearly deficient in authenticity or values-based practice themselves but projecting a shadow that is compelling.

 

ED&I or culture management within organisations has to be about much more than woke PR trotted out for any trendy cause for a month of a year. It’s surely about ever-adapting ways of working to encourage colleagues to find common ground between their core values and those of the organisation and, as a result, continuously delivering better business outcomes by taking increasing ownership over the  goals they share…willingly.

 

In the hearts and likes version of the people profession devoid of a mature systems approach, the means become the end. In this world, organisations either end up alienating the bulk of their colleagues with fluffy talk in pursuit of what remains a minority agenda or lose sight of why they’re in business for in the first place and hemorrhage customers. Witness some major brands like Harley Davidson who are back-tracking in this area, pointing to a perceived loss of focus.

 

Post pandemic, we’re clearly living in more emotionally attuned times. For better or for worse, people feel the zeitgeist more keenly now, whether driven by algorithms or what passes for news. Most are literally plugged into others, (whether they like it or not), via their electronic devices. Emotions are powerful and can undoubtedly cloud commercialism. But sustainable businesses are balanced businesses. Their leaders take multiple stakeholder management very seriously. It’s the compass that guides their strategy. The trick is, in order to continue to make proper, informed and balanced decisions about their identity as it evolves leaders have to be acutely aware of their vital anchor points and strengths:

  1. – their purpose and core goals
  2. – their unique selling points and differentiators
  3. – how their OD strategy reinforces and perpetuates the above, continuously adapting to remain current and future fit.

 

They then need to enshrine these behavioural anchor points in the ways of working of all leaders and perpetually and agilely improve and enhance their offer in line with customer and wider stakeholder feedback. This calls for systems thinking, ensuring that all moving parts work in synchronicity and complement one another.

 

Invariably, the people elements are the trickiest to get right. But inevitably, on most projects or programmes, they receive the least investment in terms of time and budget.

 

Diversity has undoubtedly become a buzz word. It’s often mentioned out of context of its siblings equality and inclusion and too often is positioned as either a right; a moral crusade; an atonement for historic ills; a response to victimhood or even a manifestation of moral superiority. Positioned this way, it appeals to those who see themselves as somehow wronged, searching for a safe and not necessarily productive space; raises the collective heckles of those who feel blamed for something they had no active part in or sometimes, yes sometimes, it becomes a ready and consuming cause for folk to align behind, hopefully touching upon the commercials, at some point.

 

There are a host of difficulties with this positioning, not least:

 

  1. – it places the focus of improvement activity on a minority cause to the exclusion of the majority of colleagues
    – it creates a parent/child, two camp dynamic that infantilises the minority
    – it breeds resentment as it often detracts from the business goals

 

The point of ED&I within the corporate sphere, stripping out the emotions and ethics, is to enable the organisation to perform more effectively either by accessing a wider talent pool; tune in to the needs of stakeholders more effectively; innovating better; evolving to changing demographics and markets faster or enriching with differing styles that stretch and evolve the core.

 

That last point is crucial. Organisations are made up of manifold individual identities but they are drawn together under one vision; purpose; strategy; value set and culture. If you own the business, you are the ultimate custodian of all of the above and it’s most likely that, in this era,  if you want to succeed commercially, clarity and inclusiveness are both key.

 

Whether you’re a business; organisation or nation-state,  the notion of multi-culturalism is both attractive and problematic. It’s attractive because it encompasses all-comers and caters for all varieties and tastes. But it’s tougher to manage and lead.

 

Brand, or identity, is mostly behavioural. It’s a signal to stakeholders, including investors, customers and indeed colleagues,  of the behaviour they can expect when interacting with the organisation and its leaders. It’s measured by reputation, what people say about you when you’re not there. And everyone’s on a form of Tripadvisor these days.

 

In order to differentiate, your brand has to define what it stands for. But it also has to be clear about what it doesn’t. It can’t be all things to all people. It takes a prejudiced stance. And that’s nothing to be ashamed of. That’s the point of having a unique point of difference. By the same token, it has to be scaleable and manageable, so its ways of working cant be entirely chaotic or self-determined by every employee. Unique standards and norms and guidelines and principles, governance and values and behavioural boundaries are part of the collateral that defines an organisation or a brand. These define difference. They are your USP. Consistency is an indicator of a healthy corporate culture, but it requires compliance and that’s an uncomfortable fact, for some.

 

So, multi-culturalism, in an absolute sense, is only really viable within a corporate environment within a range of tolerable variances. It’s the same principle that applies to total quality management where the nature of physical outputs is guaranteed by controlling a unique formula of inputs with the human inputs famously being the greatest source of problems, but also innovation. A strong systems-thinking environment can embrace diversity and inclusion. Of course it can and, of course it should. But as with any healthy adult relationship, there are behavioural boundaries that everyone has to work within in order to sustain the working status quo and achieve the key goals. There are givens. They create the bedrock on which the negotiables and variables should thrive. Systems and processes need to be in place to enable necessary experimentation; growth and continuous improvement to challenge and shape that status quo. But innovation is more an act of perspiration than inspiration and it requires discipline and focus. You’re just more likely to generate the good stuff if you somehow also embrace difference in pursuit of a common goal.

 

The long and the short of this debate is that leaders should treat culture development with at least as much care as the finances, not least because it’s a lot more complicated. They need to be as clear about culture development goals as they are outcomes sought and to role-model their core values. These simple steps alone should be sufficient for the future focused leader to embrace the notions of diversity, equality and inclusion as they can readily influence all three without marginalising their colleague base.

 

While multi-culturalism has its challenges, evolving core culture to remain inclusive and adaptable is eminently achievable. But like the best things in life, it takes dedication, commitment, focus, prioritisation, team effort, consistency and hard work.

 

Yet how many CEO’s still leave this task to the HRD to tackle on their own?

 

Do you?

 

Smiley face in broken mirror

 

 

 

 

 

“Ever squeezed a wonky table tennis ball?”



That was the question I was asked by one of the most pragmatic internal change agents I’ve met, while I was running a so-called” transformation masterclass” recently


“You see, if the ping pong ball gets damaged, if you use force to restore it, as you apply pressure in one area, all it does is pop out in another. So, what you need to do instead is float it in a beaker of hot water. This subtler action equalises the force on the system and, with any luck, it re-forms, like magic “


An odd but actually a great analogy.. come to think of it, it’s the very reason why our organisation development transformation system, (the Mosaic magic) has seven parts, or stations and why we always analyse transformation challenges from each of these points.


When the organisation’s culture has been bent or bashed out of shape by a series of incidents or the more subtly relentless forces of change (as every culture does, from time to time), blunt trauma solutions never work (like single events or passionate speeches). The only sustainable solution is to develop a transformation programme that slowly heats up or energises the environment on several fronts at once and if this is achieved, systematically, it gradually assumes the right shape.

In true hero’s change journey style. it’s most effective to start with the what, by crafting or reiterating an inspiring purpose, vision, value-set and transformation strategy. Positioning the colleague life-cycle from attraction through to departure in this context is a real opportunity to differentiate the brand and reassure as well as engage. So (top tip) do make sure that your communications colleagues are in the camp of champions.

The bulk of the work (the how, when and where) comes next, namely designing the culture development initiatives that will unite and focus the key change community, the first line managers. 

Then, most importantly, back up the supportive words and intentions with intense but persistent leadership development. Coaching and mentoring of the most important influencers, equips them to take accountability (it’s what they’re paid for after all) and to be the change you need to see.

This may sound like common sense for those with the tender touch and emotional intelligence. But in our experience, systemic sense like this is far from common in the board room where cost and margin dominates the agenda, making the role of the internal change agent far from easy. Oddly, the fact that costs mount and margin disappears in the face of disengaged, tired and subversive colleagues, seldom gets a mention when the monthly beans are being counted (but that’s a tale for another day). 


The person at the center of this particular story was attending the workshop because, by their own admittance, they had been bent out of shape by the relentless pressure of trying to apply this logical approach in an environment that persistently put people investment last. For a while, they had given up hope and had fallen into the trap of following the cynics down the energy drains.

It happens to us all, at times. But when the pressure builds, the answer’s usually the same:


  1. > Firstly run towards the challenges in the dark cave (it’s where the greatest gains are to be found)
  2. > Secondly, embrace the negative feedback from stakeholders, fold it into a deliberate strategy and plan and use the energy to re-shape and bounce back. 

It does seem counter-intuitive to reach for the boiling water when the culture is wonky. 


But remember the table-tennis analogy and use the balance of the force.


So – Ping pong anyone?

We all walk around with more computing power in our pockets, these days, than the combined might of computers in the 80s and 90s. So it’s easy to think that the chatbots; filters; influencers and auto-generators can do our job for us as leaders. Because that’s what they claim.

 

Well, the good news is, for the evolving, authentic leaders out there, you’re probably more valuable than ever. Because, despite the catfishing; the smoke; the mirrors and the relentless personal PR endorsed by empty likes and melodramatic standout stewards and click-baiters, authenticity and results-based stewardship is more valuable now than ever. Because someone has to steer the organisation’s metaphorical ship through choppy and complex, ever-changing waters. And that somebody ain’t Big Brother/Sister or programmers.

We’re fortunate enough to work across sectors with individual coaching clients and cohorts of junior, middle and senior leaders who span most of the five generations at work right now. And despite embracing what the best of the fresh tech can bring, the classics remain and will always stand the test of time.

Certainly when it comes to personal standout, impact and appeal, these established tips remain as true now as they ever were, no matter how short the attention span of the stakeholder groupings who have, charmingly, brought back the notion of “crushing it like a boss”..

 

Leading really isn’t about “bossing” anything.
Engagement (appealing to both head and heart) isn’t about stunning charisma mastered in selfies As most acting coaches will tell you, presence is largely conferred upon an individual by the reaction of others, not what you claim it to be.

 

True respect and deference comes from a combination of deep-seated self-belief (from success, plain and simple); planning; practice & authenticity.

Presence, on the back of these foundations, can be developed through following some simple principles, like these, & finding what suits your personality. But to be sustained, it has to be backed up by outputs; results and reputation:

 

1. Project Confidence: Believe in yourself and your performance. Stand tall, maintain eye contact. When you feel confident, the audience will sense it too.

2. Know Your Audience: Understand who you’re performing for. Adapt your energy, tone, & style to connect with them. Engage with their reactions and adjust accordingly.

3. Body Language Matters: Posture: Stand or move with purpose. Avoid fidgeting or slouching, unless you’re doing it for effect.

4. Gestures: Use expressive gestures to emphasize points or emotions.

5. Movement: Move purposefully within the space. & use it to involve different parts of the audience.

6. Energy & Enthusiasm: Be Animated: Express emotions genuinely. Show enthusiasm for your material and tell a story..

7. Vary Intensity: Adjust your energy level based on the content. Build anticipation during intense moments and relax during quieter ones.

8. Eye Contact: Connect with individuals in the crowd. It creates a personal bond and draws them into your performance.

9. Practice: Rehearse extensively. Familiarity with your material allows you to focus on engaging the audience rather than remembering lines or chords.

10. Breathing Techniques: Deep Breaths: Calm nerves and maintain control by taking deep breaths.
11. Diaphragmatic Breathing: Breathe from your diaphragm to project your voice effectively.
12. Authenticity: Be true to yourself. Authenticity resonates with audiences. Let your personality shine through.
13. React: Unplanned stuff happens. Respond to cues or energy.
14. Adapt to Mishaps: Stay Calm: If something goes wrong, maintain composure. The audience often forgives minor slip-ups. Improvise and turn mistakes into opportunities
15. Feedback and Reflection: Learn from Each Performance: Analyze what worked and what didn’t.

 

Take no notice of what the “one-upmanship” types are professing online. It’s easy to shine superficially with filters and gimmicks or empty “likes” Focus, instead, on your authentic style.

Hard work will pay dividends from the stakeholders that count.

Most of all, be yourself because, as your phone will remind you, everyone else is taken.

 

The Winter Solstice has always been a very testing time of year for people in the Northern hemisphere, where most of the mythology surrounding the period originates.

You don’t have to be a Christian to appreciate that, as the light dwindles and the days draw shorter and increasingly colder, it becomes increasingly tougher for everyone physically and emotionally. This is why people cleverly invented many of the traditions we now associate with the time like twinkling lights; the giving of gifts; indulgent behaviour and yes, the focus on goodwill towards one another. Yes, Indeed, it should be a time when people put aside their differences and group together to help one another through into the new year and the green shoots of Spring and renewal.

 

2023 seems to have been an especially tough year, for many, certainly judging by our cross-sector experience. It has often been made worse by unpredictability and the prevalence of identity politics and the exaggeration of difference to create otherness and perpetuate division in the interests of greed. But decent people know there’s always another, more hopeful and positive way.

 

The Mosaic proposition and approach to leadership development is based on the understanding that sustainable organisation cultures stem from unity of vision and common purpose. Yet they also thrive on embracing difference and inclusion. And that’s how we should view the unique and important rites, norms and rituals that shine like totems and beacons to steer us through the tough times and changing demands we all face.

 

2024 will probably not be any easier as the many forces that surround us all remain disappointingly chaotic and unstable. We may not be able to manage them all, but we can all change the way we react to them and, whatever happens, can continue to listen, learn and adapt.

 

Something else that we can all control is the way we apply our personal agency and energy. Regardless of how different others are and how they bring their traits and habits, norms and preferences to our “table”, if we respond from a place of positivity, respect, kindness and a willingness to try to improve together, we’re half way to overcoming the worst that life can throw at us and will be more receptive to spot the opportunities, the magical moments of lights and inspiration that we’re all capable of.

So our festive message to you, whether you’re reading this as a client, partner, colleague or someone we’ve yet to meet is simple: whatever your culture, belief system, background or aspirations for the future, the team at Mosaic would like to wish you a happy, peaceful, and fulfilling season and we hope that the new year is filled with opportunities to tap into your full potential, whatever role you play.

 

Here’s to you and your leadership journey and we look forward to sharing stories with you in the weeks and months ahead.

 

All the very best from Kate, Ian and the Mosaic team.

“Most people don’t listen with the intent to understand they listen with the intent to reply.”

Stephen Covey

 

We all know the powerful effect of truly being listened to and heard. Think about the last time you were treated that way.

 

Remember how it felt?

 

Amongst other things, it’s engaging, encouraging, and empowering; flattering; respectful and validating.

 

But if we’re honest with ourselves, as senior executives, when in a conversation, most of our time listening is spent waiting for our opening to make the points we want to make rather than listening to understand. In fact, you’re probably reading this, waiting for affirmation of your belief system rather than challenge as it’s simply easier when life feels increasingly tough. Gotcha!

 

If we’re not self-aware enough, this tendency to seek echoes gets worse as we move up the organisational hierarchy, and the compulsion to “have answers” increases. And it’s dangerous.

 

Leadership can feel a lot like having to distil solutions AND make decisions, much of the time. Resources (including patience) are short, tolerance is finite, and the burden is bulky. But how many of today’s problems require solutions from our store of yesterday’s answers? Some, yes. But an increasing number call for fresh thinking.

 

We all think we can communicate well. Yet effective communication is about much more than receiving or downloading information, and effective communication skills are central to leadership. It is a leadership skill requiring ongoing development.

 

Excellent communication is about creating a productive environment for a truly positive exchange, selecting appropriate channels and skills, and then following through on what we receive by committing to an action. Most people forget about that last bit. It’s largely about doing something with what we learn, even if that something ends up being a conscious decision to do nothing.

 

So it makes good sense to listen well.

 

Yet therein lies the challenge. If we only listen to respond without being truly open to alternative perspectives that could influence and improve our personal viewpoints, then not only are we potentially missing out on the richness that comes with additional perspective, but we also remain locked in that snug echo chamber of our own making. And in that chamber of broken records and cracked mirrors, we run the risk of duplicating the same patterns, including mistakes. In a world that is changing fast, this can be the very definition of stupidity, from a leadership perspective at least.

 

So, no surprise that the latest trait to feature in our Leadership Reflections blog, taken from our Future Fit Leadership poll 2022/23, is Listening, given that Future Fit leaders listen effectively to understand and then adapt, where necessary.

 

This month, it’s more than apt that our five-minute blog is a collaboration with one of our most trusted partners and affiliates, the much-lauded Michelle Reid. Rated as one of HR’s Most Influential (2022) People & Operations Directors, Michelle currently leads the people function at the Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM). She is very much an evolutionary HR head, taking responsibility for her own developmental journey to inspire the evolution of her organisation.

 

Here’s what Michelle had to say about listening as a leadership skill, shared in the hope that there are some points of practical use for you:

 

“You don’t have to work in the people specialisms or to be a senior leader to tell when someone is really listening to you versus listening to respond. It’s really all in the body language and interaction, right? They say communication is 7% words, 33% tone, and 55% body language. The same is true for listening. When someone makes eye contact, they mirror your stance, they gesture or react during what you are saying with verbal cues or expressions, and most of all, when you are finished, they make an effort to clarify their understanding by repeating back or paraphrasing. They don’t rush to judge, respond, or defend. They take the time to understand, reflect, and ask what’s needed or what’s next. The same courtesies should apply when in a pressurised environment like a senior meeting, as they do when in a more informal 1:1 but scaled for the occasion.

 

Active listening is a skill we all have, to a greater or lesser degree. But it’s something we can all work on continuously. There is nothing worse than being with someone who is distracted, jumps in, scrolls their phone, or seems in a hurry. Totally switches me off; it’s clear they aren’t there in the moment with you, so why should you bother? It’s often a sign they’re abdicating or going through the motions, and that’s especially galling when you work in a support function where it feels like they’re dumping and running.

 

It’s so important because people have an innate need to be seen and heard. Listening with intent provides that for them. A safe space where they can talk, share, present, vent, cry, or even just be, enables people to feel valued and that they matter. This isn’t just an HR thing. When people feel this, they are engaged, motivated, and perform better, even in tough times. I know this from hard data at work. Excellence is all about the environment and conditions our people work in, and that can be explored, improved, and optimised purely by listening with intent.

 

Perhaps most importantly, people have the knowledge and answers in an organisation. It’s why we don’t work alone. They are usually at the front line, so listening with intent can give you massive insight and intelligence that can help drive success.

 

HR departments can help in many ways. There are the usual go-to suspects, training, coaching, and mentoring. We can act as the facilitators of improvement feedback and make the link to leadership performance contracts. But also, data capture is important (pulse surveys and such). Ensuring that soft skills are included as enablers in dashboards and KPIs, etc. We can also help by leading by example and demonstrating the skill themselves so our colleagues follow suit. This may well be our most important step to creating a listening culture.”

 

Thanks to Michelle. Lots of food for thought, and if you like what you’ve heard and would like to dig deeper or continue the conversation, please take a look at the resources on our site or drop us a line. We’re always listening.

Growth is a welcome word in most businesses as it implies progress and greater demand for the stuff they sell. But it comes with its challenges too. There are the more obvious ones, like ensuring profitability and not just revenue. Then there are the less anticipated impacts of growth, like adapting your leadership style to embrace the fact that with every new colleague, the further the business expands from owner/manager control until soon, remembering names becomes an issue let alone traits, values and preferences, all that good stuff that oils the wheels of relationships.

 

We encounter this challenge a lot as consultants in the people space. We’ve facilitated growth development programmes for business schools, TECs and Business Links in the past, helping groups of SMEs thrive rather than strive as they grow. We also encounter these challenges when we’re brought in to help owner-managed organisations, or divisions and units of corporations that have grown rapidly or exponentially, trying not to become victims of their own success and desperately wanting to stay true to their roots.

 

The first step on the journey of evolving to meet the demands of growth often begins with clarifying the organisation’s core organisation development DNA: their values, employer brand, employee journey and leadership culture. We then shine the spotlight on their attitude and approach to diversity, difference and, most importantly inclusion.

 

It’s an odd word, inclusion. It’s somehow been hijacked by the political correctness lobby, yet it is, has and always will make good business sense.

 

Inclusive leadership is, quite simply, an approach to leadership and management that has a belief in the importance of diversity and equality at its core. It moves beyond the business case for inclusion (better ideas, better understanding of customers, better employee engagement etc) and proactively pursues inclusion as a core pillar of leadership philosophy, ideology and practice. In short, inclusive leaders actively cultivate the contribution of diverse individuals and teams believing it isn’t just fair and right, but is a more effective leadership strategy.

 

Cliques and close groups bonded around convergence and similar traits can, of course, be effective. But they have their limitations in fast-changing and evolving markets and environments. The ideal is to engage, bond and empower diverse teams of diverse individuals unified around common values, goals, objectives and ways of working.

 

We know from long experience that many managers consider the prospect of inclusive leadership as something akin to “herding cats”. As someone said recently, “Much easier to stick to what and who you know!” But if you encounter an inclusion Grinch, try sharing this story.

 

We were working with an uber-conservative, financial services and legal organisation based in the rainbow city of Brighton, UK. Their core culture clashed with the bohemian demographic and they were finding it hard to attract, recruit, engage and retain sparky, innovative and engaging leaders.

 

We suggested an exercise called “A day in my shoes” as part of their upcoming leadership conference in which the future of the organisation, its aspirations and goals were being showcased at a major arena to hundreds of stakeholders. As preparation for this exercise, we enlisted the heads of their diversity networks (LGBTQ; Disability; Gender; Race; Neuro) as well as a junior colleague who encapsulated the opposite of their core leader demographic, to help devise and facilitate the process.

 

Volunteers from each group wrote very personal scripts about a typical day in their lives. They then worked with a senior leader to enact that script at a workshop attended by prominent conference attendees to role model isolation and the impact that small acts of inclusive kindness have on their frame of mind, motivation and performance.

 

There was a great deal of nervousness about the exercise, yet the CEO, HRD and team put on their big person pants and gave it a go.

 

The workshop was an unprecedented success. All evaluations were top of the shop and the workshop took the participants to emotional ranges they had never experienced at work.

 

This ground-breaking activity paved the way for much more inclusive relations between the diversity groups and it well and truly landed the concept of inclusive leadership with the senior team who adapted their core processes and behaviours as a result. Since then, recruitment and retention and engagement has improved. “It’s just much easier to talk openly now. I feel seen” said one of the leaders who shared their own difficult journey to being themselves at work.

 

Of course, Inclusive Leadership isn’t just about embracing diversity. It’s largely about involving and liberating the contributions of team members rather than adopting the command and contol, DIY my way approach. But it’s really important for leaders who need to leverage their fellow leaders and managers in order to grow and it’s a great source of alternative approaches in pursuit of the same goals.

 

If it’s something you would like to explore, give one of us a nudge via the new website. Do check out what’s new. We have plenty more stories to share.

A recent article* by one of our client and academic partners, Newcastle University, sets out what has become the contemporary view of sustainable leadership. Not surprisingly it aligns contemporary leadership practice with environmental and social conscience. It’s a gradual shift that is resulting from mounting social pressure: as the world becomes increasingly aware of the impact businesses have on the triple bottom line, also known as the three P’s – people, planet and profit.

 

Dr Joanne James, Director of Executive Education and Dr Jenny Davidson, Executive MBA Degree Program Director at Newcastle University Business School set out what sustainable leadership looks like:

Dr Davidson: Sustainable leadership is all about adopting a responsible approach to the way that we lead, stopping to think about the wider impact of our actions on society and the environment. This might mean considering our wider stakeholder group, the natural systems within which we are operating and their limits.

 

It’s crucial to begin by exploring and understanding how our individual roles might contribute to tackling global challenges such as climate change and gender inequality and in doing so to recognize the value that our individual actions might bring. Responsible leaders are always looking up and out beyond their role, organization and sector.

 

Dr James: Leadership education for the future of work recognizes that we are working in volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous contexts (VUCA). Leadership is not a position or an individual person but a series of practices that enables collaborative action towards a common mission. Continuous learning and collaboration with others is central to these practices. As a result, the educational journey for every individual is unique depending upon their context.

 

Our aim is to reflect our regional ecosystem within our cohort so that all sectors and business types are represented creating a robust network of regional leaders who can collaborate beyond the boundaries of the program.

This is all very laudable, in and of itself and the sentiments are hard to take issue with. But however much of a priority the environmental agenda is or should be, for us, the Sustainable Leadership discussion is at its most impactful when it transcends even the ethical and environmental considerations that too many hard-wired capitalists may too readily discard as uber-liberalism, in this age of polemical arguments. And, in order to obtain the critical mass that the change movement needs, converts are needed from all sides of the political spectrum. To that end, we see and have always seen sustainability through a wider lens that includes and is rooted in performance. In short, the most sustainable leadership practices are those that deliver bottom line results for key stakeholders, because what gets rewarded gets done.

 

The term sustainable refers to an act or series of actions that not only can be but actually bear repeating; and nothing succeeds like success. If you take a system’s approach to the people processes, including leadership development, you soon understand that success is the result of a series of inter-connected actions or activities that become self-fulfilling because they reward the efforts of the sponsors and initiators. Viewed in this light, sustainable leadership is leadership practice that is about more than greenwash or the flash in the pan act of conscience, the rare act of charisma or benevolence, the isolated action of an enlightened individual, department, unit or group. It’s the product of a leadership system that is clear, outcomes-focused, measured, evaluated, replicated and which becomes common to such an extent that it becomes a leadership culture. It is, in effect, self-sustaining.

One of the primary contributing factors, in our experience, is the enlightened application of a balanced approach to stakeholder satisfaction based upon the use of a matrix of stakeholder satisfaction indices. If you measure shareholder, customer, employee, community and partner satisfaction simultaneously and manage the balancing act of ensuring that your vision, strategy and plans get buy in from all of those groups, plugging your leaders into the same success criteria, then there’s a fair chance that the choices you make together are going to be good for the community, your colleagues, customers and the environment.

 

In recent years, we’ve worked with leaders in sectors as varied as heavy industry, utilities and public sector to help develop leadership competencies and evaluation systems that not only embrace environmental considerations and ethics, with values at their core, but which take a multiple-stakeholder satisfaction stance. Gone are the days of driving shareholder value “uber ales”and at the expense of community and employee satisfaction. But the wise CEO doesn’t treat those communities as mutually exclusive either and ensures that their leadership team acts accordingly and has the will and skill to play the balancing act.

 

So, while this month’s theme is very much concerned with the ethics of leadership, we never lose sight of the truism that the greatest leaders aren’t martyrs. Sustainability focused, future fit leadership is about sustaining the good works and cultivating a self-perpetuating culture in the leader’s wake. And the surest way to ensure longevity is by being successful and earning the right to sustained influence.

 

It far transcends great PR and glib talk. It isn’t easy but it can be done, it must be done and increasingly, it’s being done and long may this trend continue.

 

https://www.topuniversities.com/courses/business-management/what-sustainable-leadership

The pandemic was probably the most chastening social experience since the world wars. Especially for those in frontline leadership roles. If it wasn’t, for you, then you may have an empathy challenge and should probably take a break until the fog clears. Honestly!

 

Shock and disruption aside, we’ll probably never know the true human tragedy directly attributable to the disease, but it’s staggering. Worse still, we’ll never get to fully understand the hidden toll from the economic pandemic that shortly followed global lockdown’s tail. So, if you remain oddly unfazed by the human catastrophe, you should at least be able to recognise the devastation caused by the disruption to global trading and the subtler impact that Covid-19 and the prolonged contingency working has had on your key workers. And you should be striving to find a way to boost their coping mechanisms….and your own.

 

From what we’ve seen as consultants, most organisations leaned very heavily on the 20-40% of their colleagues who generate 80% of their outputs, while much of the rest went knowingly AWOL for an extended time, fighting their own insecurities, doubts and fears. Problem is, the same 20-40% have had to pivot several times now to deal with many conflicting demands that have arisen since,  as most businesses settle back into old ways of working complete with commute, office and command and control structures. The fact is, the old system is no longer fully serving them.

 

They’ve also become accustomed to a lot more balance in their lives, have started to question where they get their self-actualisation from, and may have begun to look at alternatives to resuming the old normal. The same, however, can’t be said for the “working dead” who are marking down the days to retirement or redundancy, while making the most of the resources at work I exaggerate to emphasise the point but, I know you know what I mean.

 

The leadership paradigm has shifted, as has the old-style employer/employee psychological contract. Have you adapted in the same vein?

There’s been a lot of talk about human or humane leadership traits now that the dust has settled. It seems that people grew accustomed to seeing their managers in their natural habitats and quite liked the fact that they could all be themselves a little more, when all faced with a common enemy, an invisible threat that doesn’t discriminate on the grounds of status.

We have had increasing enquiries from leaders and managers concerned about the sustained pressure that their people have been under and asking for fresh approaches to coaching and mentoring that is a little more ethical, responsive and, dare we say, sustainable in this complex new world.

 

Now, some of you will snort, with scepticism at this point, especially those who recall how certain high profile business schools suddenly started talking about ethics and morality again after the banking thoroughbreds bolted from their golden stables at the turn of the century and almost collapsed global economies. Of course, very little changed other than a few more values and behaviours workshops, equality and diversity management roles, expensive ad campaigns and some re-arranging of top jobs. But this time, things are different. Because this time, the burning platforms has at least singed us all. And this time, there are no “off the shelf” workarounds and platitudes to resort to.

 

This time, both the leaders and their teams need to change and it isn’t sector specific. To illustrate my point, last month we announced the first of our annual Mosaic Top Ten Future Fit Leadership Traits rankings. As we announced, this will become an annual event, in conjunction with a leading business school (watch this space). We’ve just completed a deep diagnostic of a client’s leadership and management teams and, without any form of consultation, their leaders AND managers, as separate groups, both ordered the top five leadership traits exactly the same with Human, Ethical and Sustainable all near the top. The key point here is that these traits aren’t the pandering, politically correct stuff of the pipe dreams of the past which are feasted upon by the dogs of commercial war and competition, they ARE the traits that will enable future fit leaders to adapt and lead by listening and with empathy, responding and becoming comfortable with increasing ambiguity. Do you really doubt that the world of work isn’t going to become an increasingly complex place? Think leaders will survive by adhering steadfastly to models that applied to simpler times? Are you even the same person you were pre-pandemic? How did you use the time to reflect and dream and change? Intend to stick by those resolutions or, like a stress ball, are you resuming the old shape?

 

You may be interested to know that alongside Leadership Reflections thought pieces like this one, the team at Mosaic will be launching a podcast as well as running at least four Masterclass Workshops on key themes, this year. The first will be in Spring and will be packed with best practices, on these topics, for the HR, line management and general leadership communities. So, if you, or a friend or colleague would benefit from discussing the challenges you all face in more detail, picking up a few pragmatic tips and techniques or just wants to vent with like minds, do point your contacts towards our blog where news of the events will appear shortly.

 

Until we next meet, here’s hoping that your planning for the year ahead is going well. Best wishes for 2023 and beyond from the team at Mosaic. It promises to be a time of continued challenge and opportunity, calling for open minds and fresh thinking.

 

We look forward to continuing the conversation…

This is not only being fuelled by the pace at which technology is merging the physical and digital worlds, demanding more and more functionality from the same biological constructs, people, but it’s also being driven by the rapidly changing and constantly shifting socioeconomic conditions that bring daily influence to bear on organisations and by association us as people.

 

It’s tough enough rowing in a small boat in this perfect storm with no real sign of land. Imagine being in charge of the flotilla, morally and contractually obliged to steer a course through without losing anyone and emerging ready for the next set of challenges.

 

If you’re reading this blog, then I suspect you don’t need to imagine. It’s most likely your daily lived reality and we know, because our team has either spent significant time in-house helping to steer as internal change agents or they have been coaching and partnering on leadership programmes as external consultants. We see and hear what leaders across sectors are going through and it’s a time of huge demand and challenge, yet also full of opportunity.

 

Lewin famously speaks of unfreezing and then re- freezing corporate cultures to ensure that behaviour change sticks. Well, it’s especially tough when the water’s this salty and raging. So leadership skills are evolving. It may be tough to look ahead and through the storm clouds. But that’s part of the job, to remain future fit while doing the day job based on known paradigms…then being prepared to evolve them. That’s how we ensure the organisations, people and communities that we serve remain future fit and ready to sail through whatever conditions might be coming up next.

 

One of the ways in which we’re trying to help, as leadership coaches, is to keep stock of the forces at play and reflecting on the top leadership qualities required to meet the challenges of the time. We do this partly through critically exploring the hundreds of leadership coaching sessions we have across sectors at the highest of levels, every year. But also by reviewing what some of the more respected consultancy and other thinking houses suggest are future fit leadership traits.

 

This year, post lockdowns, leading into the current financial, identity, governance, establishment, and environmental influenced epoch, we suggest the following ten critical future fit leadership traits stand out as essential:

 

  • Human, empathic and authentic
  • Ethical and sustainable behaviour
  • Inclusive coaching style
  • Influencing skills
  • Listening and adapting
  • Evidence and data driven
  • Decisive
  • Handles complexity well
  • Visionary, strategic and commercial focus
  • Maintains focus regardless

 

Interestingly, in our research, maintaining focus was ranked just above visionary and strategic, a reflection of how the best leaders, through times that have uniquely tested everyone at once, have thrived rather than simply survived. And the teams that have been the most resilient have been working for leaders who have clear, balanced, inspirational goals with short as well as longer term deliverables. These leaders have been able to not only ensure the wellbeing of their colleagues in the face of immediate risk but have also taken advantage of down time and confusion to look to the longer term, post crisis and offer hope, purpose, opportunity, and a mission the other side of uncertainty.

 

There’s certainly some food for thought here for you and your HR teams especially to reflect upon as we enter the last few days of 2022.

 

We will be repeating this exercise annually and revealing the revised Future Focused Leadership Traits poll around the same time next year when we’re hoping to co-deliver a workshop, as part of our series of live sessions, with academics from a leading University. So watch this space and please circulate this blog to any colleagues and contacts who may be interested.In the meantime, if you have any thoughts, reflections or questions about this or any of our core topics, do drop us a line or get yourself onto our Newsletter mailing list. We publish thought pieces and case studies monthly and will be happy to welcome you to the Mosaic community.

If you’ve been attracted to this discussion piece because you’re hoping for someone to make the business case for equality, diversity and inclusion in the workplace, then you’re on the wrong page, literally and metaphorically.

 

We’ll gladly point people towards papers linked to studies that prove the financial benefits. These range from greater employee engagement through to better decision making, more innovation, happier customers and, quite frankly, respecting the law. But we’re long past the business case stage and hope you are too.

 

Interestingly, most of the business case pieces were written at least a decade ago. If you really still need a business case to embrace the concept of celebrating difference while creating a culture of inclusion in pursuit of your organisation’s goals, then you may be the wrong person for the job as the ED&I conversation has moved on from “what, who and why?” to “when and how?”. It really has.

 

Like my consulting colleagues at Mosaic, I’ve had the pleasure of working nationally and internationally in some very varied and diverse environments, helping develop work cultures within corporate and national cultural frameworks that have been challenging. Bringing change to countries like South Africa and Northern Ireland or implementing values-led leadership in global corporations that touch upon every major geography and which need to be personalised for local employee demographics, isn’t easy. Yet when inclusion is the focus while simultaneously celebrating the diversity of identities, skills, thinking styles and personal journeys that contribute towards that change, it can be an exhilarating challenge. And isn’t that what work should be?

 

Even when working in one of the ED&I epi-centres of global renown, Brighton, there are still lessons to be learned.

 

Just before the pandemic struck, I was helping a public sector organisation develop a future fit working culture and, in the process, continuously improve their employee engagement to become an employer brand of choice in a territory where they had an image challenge.

 

They had enabled the development of over a dozen special interest groups representing the spectrum of what they believed was their core ED&I demographic ranging from BAME through to the Proud Network.

 

Each group was clearly committed to the needs and interests of their core members and had an Executive lead. But as there was a limited budget for engagement activities, incongruence was never far from the surface and progress generally was a struggle at times.

 

I was able to help in a number of ways. Useful contributions included:

 

  • holding listening sessions with them all and obtaining feedback from the 70% or so colleagues who weren’t members of any society or group
  • providing all groups with a common platform at the annual, very high-profile colleague conference
  • ensuring that the top team understood the business case for inclusion using a blend of bespoke data and several talks by prominent lawyers and accountants who had undertaken ED&I transformation journeys and were now advocates

 

The listening groups demonstrated, very clearly, that diversity wasn’t the challenge. The organisation’s recruitment process had ensured that they were meeting their quantitative demographic goals. Their greatest challenge was retention and inclusion. In short, once they managed to attract a great blend of talented people, they were struggling to keep them and the focus on “difference” was alienating, in some part, rather than unifying.

 

Having gained senior team endorsement for the conference agenda and the license to innovate, the catalyst of an empty stage for an hour with a collective ED&I banner above it proved to be the challenge needed to unite the groups. A couple of facilitators stood out as natural, inclusive leaders and between us we were able to devise an engaging and inclusive experiential workshop called In My Shoes.

 

The premise of the exercise was to capture a typical day in the life of someone with protected characteristics or a typical member of a special interest group and to illustrate the challenges they face. These were turned into immersive scripts and then the scripts were exchanged with members from another group who gave some form of performance to bring that day to life. These ranged from reciting poems through to role plays and silent monologues.

 

The content of the exercises was carefully guarded until the day of the conference and conference delegates got to self-select what breakout workshop sessions they would like to attend based upon the teaser communication provided by the group.

 

I had to manage a great deal of nervousness within the senior team and HR function, concerned by what promised to be a controversial session. This was on top of the usual performance anxiety of the workshop leads and the night before included tears and tantrums. However, when the bookings opened, it was the first session to sell out.

 

The conference was as stressful as these totemic events always are, and I had to wear many hats on the day. But I took time out to pop into the ED&I workshop and it was captivating.

 

The audience was truly inclusive and the performances were both touching and educating. The conference itself was a triumph, but the workshop breakout is the first time I’ve witnessed a session gain universal acclaim, with all respondents giving it maximum satisfaction and education scores.

 

At Mosaic, as you may well know, we pride ourselves on creating tailored, immersive and transformational strategies and leadership interventions that deliver sustainable results. This modest illustration hopefully shows why we’re so beyond the business case and why ED&I especially is a concept that means nothing unless fine words are matched by finer deeds.

 

When that balance is reached, magic happens. And when the intervention is part of an OD system where the components complement one another, then it’s the sweet spot. But as with all people initiatives, it takes a lot of hard partnership work and experience to reach that point

This is our 11th blog in this year’s series. Until next time, if you would like a conversation with one of our diverse leadership team about your own ED&I challenges, then we’d love to hear from you.

 

Best, as ever.

Ian

 

PS. If you would like more case studies like this then you can download specific chapters from Ian’s books by following this link.